Can I Use Studio Mp Art for the Guitar
Any Fine art Tube MP Studio V3 users here?
Hello there,
I went and got myself an Art Tube MP Studio V3 preamp fairly inexpensive off the net and am wondering if I got a dud?
My problem is the noise it makes. I've read a lot of reviews and obviously noise came up a lot. I wasn't expecting anything like summit or even mid range quality from a cheap unit like this but I was hoping it would be usable!
Here's my experience with it:
I am plugging the unit into a modest 25w peavey guitar amp without anything plugged into the V3's input.
If I set both the input and output levels midway (12 o'clock) without its +20db button pressed in there is a modest amount of hiss present with an occasional rustling noise creeping in.
If I then switch the +20db pad on, the hiss becomes extreme. In fact, with +20db turned on, you lot cannot raise the output level above the first indicator without the unit of measurement becoming unusable due to it's hiss.
Is this normal for the Studio V3? Have I got a dud? Is the valve dead (it doesn't seem to glow at all and I'm not sure whether I should wait information technology to?)?
If anyone here owns ane and will admit to it(!) I'd beloved to hear whether this is normal behaviour or if i need to return it.
Thanks in accelerate...
They're terrible. Had ane early, and fifty-fifty as a newbie I could tell information technology was junk. Only bury it and so that no 1 else tries to utilize it.
Quote:
Originally Posted past KrispyDK ➡️
Hello in that location,
I went and got myself an ART Tube MP Studio V3...
Here's my experience with information technology:
I am plugging the unit into a pocket-size 25w peavey guitar amp without annihilation plugged into the V3's input....
I don't have an Fine art Tube MP, but I'g fairly certain that the problem is that you are using it incorrectly. The Tube MP is designed to bring a tiny depression impedance microphone signal up to line level. From at that place, you can plug it into, say, a recording device, a audio input on a computer, or a mixing board - all of these inputs expect a line level signal.
Your Peavey guitar amp is not designed to accept a line level betoken; it expects to see a a loftier impedance signal via the patch cord from your guitar. You are overloading the input with the relatively large line-level signal.
If you lot desire to run a mic through your Peavey amp, utilise an impedance transformer, which unremarkably looks like a big fat plug with an XLR-Female person connector on one end and a i/4"-Male plug on the other.
Lives for gear
I started out with one of those. Information technology really is bad. There are a few settings that are... okay, if that'due south not the ONLY preamp you're using. Simply for the money you probably spent on it, you could accept gotten a Soundcraft Compact 4 mixer, with two really decent preamps AND four channels of mixer. If at that place'due south Any way of getting your money back, get it back. If you can't, check online for different things you lot tin do to improve the sound. I've tried amend tubes but information technology doesn't really assistance - information technology's a starved plate design, which means it's non really getting much voltage to the tube - you'll larn the phrase "toob" the hard manner.
The all-time thing about that preamp is information technology has a VU meter, which is neato. Otherwise, I don't retrieve you'll get much employ from information technology, especially as yous go frontwards and get improve and ameliorate stuff - I haven't used mine in several years. Every so often, I'll pull it out, turn it on and think I must take missed something, but no. it stinks. All those settings, you'd think there'southward GOTTA exist something expert - it's just unlike versions of blech.
Wish i had better news for you. Learn from the fault and enquiry on gearslutz earlier any purchases! Next time try a Meaty four, a DMP3, a MS1B - these are depression budget but will serve yous well.
I dig my MP but yeap they suck actually noisy.. but i similar LoFi
Gear Nut
I only use mine equally a DI for guitars that are gonna exist modeled with Pod Farm or things like that. It works good for that and that just.
They are good value for money and do actually warm the signal. Yes they dont sound as proficient or become close to the sound of a correctly designed hello voltage plate blueprint, but they dont sound bad either if used correctly. Merely because information technology is cheap doesnt mean it is bad. The sound of the valve will be less vibrant and smeary in comparison but volition add together harmonic distortion. When overloaded for distortion, i found the pre bankrupt up quite nicely and utilise it as an effect nowadays but it will function as a preamp perfectly well as well. The pro vla gets very skilful user reports and that also uses a low voltage plate if i am not mistaken, so give information technology a try.
Back to the post - joe is absolutely correct - if you are going into the art from your guitar and out from the art into the amps instrument input and so yous will be providing completely the wrong impedance to the amp and also the wrong indicate size. If your amp has auxillary send and returns and then you tin can send a portion of the amps signal out to the fine art and so back in or you could bypass the preamp on your amp and use the fine art as such by pluging your guitar into the art and the art line out into the auxillary return on your amp - this method can also exist used to amplify a microphone, but without auxillaries you would demand to change the impedance for a mic as joe says.
Gear Aficionado
You are using it incorrect.
Why are y'all running from the Tube MP into a Guitar Amp? that just makes no sense at all.
I really like what mine does to bass guitar. Its my permanent Bass guitar DI setup.
I run Bass Guitar into DI -> Art Tube MP V3 directly to disk and really like the tone I become on the bass.
I remember i plugged a mic into it once or twice (for recording Guitar Amp or Tamborine) but mostly i simply use it on bass Guitar.
Gear Guru
My tube mp works great for my mic talk back in the control room. 
All kidding aside, not sure I would cutting a high end recording with it but not a bad unit if your but starting off.
I happen to really like mine, have the original one and the V3 models. Works well on bass, and helped out on this guys voice I recorded- warmed it up just correct. You lot have to know how and when the Tube MP would work for the application, like anything else in sound. Also makes a slap-up DI, and with tube warmth y'all can't go wrong.
Gear Maniac
Quote:
Originally Posted past Glenn Kuras ➡️
My tube mp works great for my mic talk back in the command room.
All kidding aside, not sure I would cut a high cease recording with it merely non a bad unit of measurement if your just starting off.
ahaaaa
That's what I'll use mine for. Never thought of that. Information technology actually solves a problem I was thinking about the other day.
Cheers Glenn.
Lives for gear
fine art tube mp hater here, too.
i owned 3 of them dorsum in the day. when i got them i was not impressed with them and could not truely hear the difference between them and the behringer lath pres i had at the time. duh! they are both low finish pres and audio horrible. i fifty-fifty did a tube bandy in ane and information technology helped, only didn't truely arrive usable.
yous can definitely pace it up for a bit over $100. for the el cheapo stuff, i like the presonus tube pre, but at the minimum i feel that every low finish studio needs the GAP pre-73.
If some people have experienced noise with this unit, I'g non sure how they were using, or if theirs was faulty.
Mine works keen. I use information technology for vocals and acoustic instruments (piano accordion, dabble, whistles, mandolin, etc.) for folk and rock music. I specifically use it with a big capsule condenser microphone. Even though it has a agglomeration of settings on it, I find the Warm/Song combination works all-time for everything.
I retrieve if you lot are attempting to utilise this to preamp a guitar betoken into your guitar amp, it might non piece of work properly. I purchased this unit to bypass the crappy onboard preamps on my old, cheap mixer. My guess is that your application is incorrect, although it might be worth finding out if your unit is defective.
Matt
Lives for gear
btw, non overly noisy, just no detail in this preamp. really cloudy blazon of audio. had a bunch of character, in the lo-fi way. i can become that with my neve clones and with improve detail.
Hello Everyone,
Thanks for the response to my original postal service. Yous're all absolutely right, i shouldn't take used information technology plugged into a guitar amp as this is non what information technology's designed for. I've learnt a lot in the concluding couple of days!
Thank you all for not chirapsia me up for not knowing that - every bit seems to happen on other forums.
I take been fiddling effectually a flake and when used correctly information technology isn't too bad after all. It was intended to add some warmth/tone to my guitar and bass so I'thou going to effort the DI->ART->Recorder set up and see how that sounds, cheers for the tip Piranhadrum & echoclerk.
I am actually holding out for a DMP3 but the UK is totally out of stock of them at the moment - so I'thousand told.
With regards to changing the tube out on the ART, can anyone let me know if this is actually worthwhile? I've read quite a few people saying that as its a starved plate design, the tube is actually more for evidence than anything else as information technology isn't getting enough juice to exercise much else.
If it is worth changing tin someone enlighten me on this: It came with a 12ax7a tube. Should i go another i of these (groovetubes/electro harmonix)? Some people have said that a 12au7 makes a bigger difference or an ecc82 or 83?
What the bloody hell is the difference between a 12ax7/12au7/ecc82/ecc83???!?!
I'chiliad a dumb british drummer, lamentable!
Quote:
Originally Posted past KrispyDK ➡️
With regards to irresolute the tube out on the Fine art, tin can anyone let me know if this is really worthwhile? I've read quite a few people saying that equally its a starved plate design, the tube is really more for show than annihilation else as it isn't getting enough juice to practice much else.
If it is worth irresolute can someone enlighten me on this: It came with a 12ax7a tube. Should i get another ane of these (groovetubes/electro harmonix)? Some people have said that a 12au7 makes a bigger deviation or an ecc82 or 83?
I received the following response from a tube expert on here when I asked the aforementioned question:
Quote:
The V3 MP runs at low voltages so the tube has less influence on the sound than the Pro MPA Ii. However, the tube position in the MP is not every bit noise-sensitive and can run great with used tubes so I oftentimes sell nice, American made tubes (RCA, Sylvania, GE) for the MP for about $20. Most people find information technology to be worth the upgrade at that price. The audio will be a scrap smoother, tighter, and the bandwith improves a bit.
Hope this helps you out. I ultimately purchased an Art MPA Pro Ii and love information technology. MUCH better sound coloration for vocals, etc. If you need to buy a tube to replace on any of your gear, hit up the GS user Bowie on here. He'll sort you out.
Matt
Thanks Matt,
I'm based in the UK and the groovetubes are nigh the same price over hither (£fifteen) so dont heed laying that out.
Would like to observe some American or European made ones though so will have to find somewhere that sells them.
Thanks once more.
I picked up a vintage Mullard from Bowie and information technology sounds keen. I recall what he was suggesting to me was that using a cheaper "upgrade" for the Studio MP V3 would be the simply replacement that would make whatsoever sense.
There are quite a few supplier on the web for tubes, then I'd exercise some Googling to find somebody there in the Great britain. Happy hunting!
Matt
Lives for gear
Quote:
Originally Posted by projektio ➡️
I received the following response from a tube practiced on hither when I asked the same question:
Hope this helps you out. I ultimately purchased an Fine art MPA Pro 2 and love it. MUCH better audio coloration for vocals, etc. If you lot need to buy a tube to supplant on any of your gear, hitting up the GS user Bowie on here. He'll sort you out.
Matt
+ane..All of the Art "Pro" gear is pretty skilful and really uses the tube, stuff not in the pro line such as the MP stuff are starved plate and the tube really don't do much!!
ART V3 not so bad?
I picked up an Fine art v3 pre from a pawn shop, at a pretty inexpensive toll and idea I'd try it.
Kickoff things first - I noticed a few people hither said it was really noisy when they ran a guitar through it to their amp, but that'southward not what it'southward for; you're finer running a pre-amp into a 2nd pre-amp. If you want to use information technology as a DI, you'd have to run the 1/4" out of the V3 to your bass/guitar amp's power amp input (or effect loop return) to bypass the amp's pre.
I recorded some bass, plugged straight into the 1/four" input, then out of the XLR to a Scarlet 2i2.
The tone I got using the 'warm' setting was great - warm, total rich bass sound, and recorded as a test into Garageband sounded far better than DI straight in. The "OPL" (limiter) settings are a bit ordinary, but the other settings seem perfectly useable. And at $thirty, information technology was worth a go.
I absolutely dearest mine...and not noisy at all. I often use information technology to warm up my ss amp, using the valve setting. Information technology makes my amp sound crawly. I utilize it for jazz, and so just a hint of proceeds. Changing the Chinese tube is a popular upgrade.
Source: https://gearspace.com/board/low-end-theory/462152-any-art-tube-mp-studio-v3-users-here.html
0 Response to "Can I Use Studio Mp Art for the Guitar"
Post a Comment